Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3174 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 286 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 3 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |