Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900F - 244 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €283.62 vs €314.9
- Up to 18% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900F - €1.16 vs €1.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€283.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8528 minutes ago
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |