Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900KF - 125 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €283.62 vs €318.6
- Up to 20% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900KF - €2.27 vs €2.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 20 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€283.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10751 minutes ago
Buy for €318.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10751 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |