Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K and the cheaper Core i3-10105T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Deathloop than Core i3-10105T - 192 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €216.6 vs €283.62
- Up to 17% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-11900K - €1.23 vs €1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
83%
Price, €
€283.62
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11345 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €216.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |