Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1820 - 252 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €35.91 vs €572.0
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €572 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
22.616305849838785%
Multi-Core
825
8.995747464834805%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |