Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Deathloop than FX-8300 - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €73.57 vs €665.91
- Up to 88% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10900X - €0.44 vs €3.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.7/FPS
11%
Price, €
€665.91
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €665.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |