Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 614 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 20% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 232 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €89.38 vs €698.89
- Up to 85% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10900X - €0.46 vs €3.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.01/FPS
15%
Price, €
€698.89
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €698.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 594 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
194
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |