Buy on Amazon
€659.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 25% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 193 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €102.0 vs €659.85
- Up to 81% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-10900X - €0.66 vs €3.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 24 vs 20 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.42/FPS
19%
Price, €
€659.85
15%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X X-Serie Prozessor 10 Kerne mit 3.7 GHz (bis 4,7 GHz mit Turbo Boost 3.0, LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Prozessor (999PNG)
Buy for €659.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5682 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
154
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102
100%
Value Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
