Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4100 - 113 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €20.59 vs €425.94
- Up to 94% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900K - €0.23 vs €3.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |