Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 88 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i3-10320 - 64 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €216.77 vs €539.9
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €539.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
88.44827586206897%
Multi-Core
4626
50.857519788918204%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |