Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €199.5 vs €732.83
- Up to 55% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 9 7950X - €1.17 vs €2.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 64% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-10320 - 281 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
60%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.61/FPS
44%
Price, €
€732.83
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €732.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |