Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 559 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 2% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-10320 - 125 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €13.33 vs €199.5
- Up to 93% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-10320 - €0.11 vs €1.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€13.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €13.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |