Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 846 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G4900 - 137 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €60.24 vs €539.9
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €539.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
35.40229885057472%
Multi-Core
1051
11.55452946350044%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |