Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €60.24 vs €558.79
- Up to 81% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-13900K - €0.97 vs €5.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 76% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G4900 - 109 vs 62 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
62
56%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15422 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.13/FPS
18%
Price, €
€558.79
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €558.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |