Buy on Amazon
€66.63
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 2969 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - €66.63 vs €177.21
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-7700T - €0.35 vs €0.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-965 - 202 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
191
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I7-965 I7 965 3,2 GHz Gebrauchter Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 130W 8M LGA 1366
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18090 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-7700T 2,90GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €177.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
