Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3704 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €66.63 vs €149.87
- Up to 53% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-9400F - €0.52 vs €1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-965 - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 65 vs 130 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
127
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Buy for €149.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |