Buy on Amazon
€66.63
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €66.63 vs €148.97
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 39% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-965 - 149 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 12 vs 8 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I7-965 I7 965 3,2 GHz Gebrauchter Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 130W 8M LGA 1366
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74734 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-11600KF Desktop-Prozessor 6 Kerne bis zu 4,9 GHz entsperrt LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipsatz) 125 W
Buy for €148.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
485
22.085610200364297%
Multi-Core
1683
19.32927529573906%
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
