Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €49.0 vs €299.17
- Up to 83% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-10900F - €0.26 vs €1.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-940 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
16%
Price, €
€299.17
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |