Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 5062 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €49.0 vs €271.33
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13600KF - €0.39 vs €1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-940 - 148 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 20 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
21%
Price, €
€271.33
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €271.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |