Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 3440 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €49.0 vs €221.64
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.43 vs €1.73 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-940 - 128 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
24%
Price, €
€221.64
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €221.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |