Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1449 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4170.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4170 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i3-4170 - €129.97 vs €138.85
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.93 vs €1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
88.57142857142857%
Price, €
€129.97
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €129.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
149
99.33333333333333%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.85
93%
Value Winner
Buy for €138.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1101
89.00565885206144%
Multi-Core
2130
40.471214136424095%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |