Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €49.0 vs €170.23
- Up to 60% better value when playing New World than Core i5-11600KF - €0.5 vs €1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 38% better in New World than Core i7-940 - 135 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 12 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
39%
Price, €
€170.23
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |