Buy on Amazon
€45.78
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4501 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 34% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €45.78 vs €69.58
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 229% better in League of Legends than Core i7-860 - 184 vs 56 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
CHYYAC Intel Core I7-860 I7 860 2,8 GHz Quad-Core Acht-Thread-CPU-Prozessor 8M 95W LGA 1156
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G6900 desktop processor 12. Generation (Basistakt: 3.4 GHz, PCIe 5.0 & 4.0 support, DDR5 and DDR4 support) BX80715G6900
Buy for €69.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
27.822832189644416%
Multi-Core
1463
54.26557863501483%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
