Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3589 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €45.78 vs €69.4
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.24 vs €0.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-860 - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Buy for €69.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |