Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1430 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €126.25 vs €294.07
- Up to 49% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900F - €0.37 vs €0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6800K - 402 vs 339 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 20 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
339
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
402
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
50%
Price, €
€294.07
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €294.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |