Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 680 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4370 - 234 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - €55.85 vs €124.78
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-6800K - €0.24 vs €0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
45%
Price, €
€124.78
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
232
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |