Buy on Amazon
€108.52
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2433 days newer than Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4820K - 132 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10400 Desktop-Prozessor, 6 Kerne, bis zu 4,3 GHz, LGA1200 (Chipsatz der Intel® 400er-Reihe), 65 W
Buy for €108.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
