Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4790 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4790 is 1218 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 339 vs 332 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €157.65 vs €181.05
- Up to 15% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.47 vs €0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790 - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
339
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
332
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
85%
Price, €
€181.05
87%
Buy for €181.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |