Buy on Amazon
€207.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $383
Availability
MSRP in USD: $383
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-4702MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2850 days newer than Core i7-4702MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 37 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 39% better in Starfield than Core i7-4702MQ - 71 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€207.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.9GHz Tuboboost: 4.9GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600K
Buy for €207.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4702MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4702MQ | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-4702MQ or Core i5-11600K
Starfield, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
32 FPS
€36.09/FPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Core i5-11600K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,154.9
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
