Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 748 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1820 - 171 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
166
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 423 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |