Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i7-3940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2864 days newer than Core i7-3940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3940XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 36% better in Starfield than Core i7-3940XM - 64 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3940XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
64
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€424.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |