Buy on Amazon
€293.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2888 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3667U - 180 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 20 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€293.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €293.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-3667U
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
