Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-3630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1066 days newer than Core i7-3630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 0% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-3630QM - 227 vs 226 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €52.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3630QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |