Buy on Amazon
€205.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-3537U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2989 days newer than Core i7-3537U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3537U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 298% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Core i7-3537U - 163 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3537U - 12 vs 4 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€205.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.9GHz Tuboboost: 4.9GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600K
Buy for €205.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-3537U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3537U | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-3537U or Core i5-11600K
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered, 1920 x 1080, Very High
91 FPS
€12.64/FPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Core i5-11600K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,149.9
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
