Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 1696 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - €51.75 vs €75.84
- Up to 30% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-2600S - €0.21 vs €0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €75.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
251
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |