Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 3258 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1620 - 229 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - €20.16 vs €257.51
- Up to 90% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-12700KF - €0.11 vs €1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €257.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 427 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
187
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |