Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 24% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1620 - 136 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €20.16 vs €289.23
- Up to 92% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600K - €0.18 vs €2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €289.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |