Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 385 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13600K.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €266.22 vs €468.37
- Up to 41% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-14900KF - €1.35 vs €2.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Core i5-13600K - 206 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600K - 32 vs 20 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
197
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€266.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €266.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6492 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
59%
Price, €
€468.37
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €468.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6492 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600K | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |