Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3319 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 20% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1620 - 378 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
378
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |