Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 2830 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1620 - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |