Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 3704 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-965 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - €66.63 vs €389.95
- Up to 82% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-9600KF - €0.52 vs €2.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
18%
Price, €
€389.95
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €389.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12982 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
127
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |