Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1864 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Stray than Celeron G1820 - 184 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €35.49 vs €151.36
- Up to 76% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-9400F - €0.2 vs €0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €151.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18585 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
176
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |