Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3321 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - €35.91 vs €145.16
- Up to 73% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-13100 - €0.17 vs €0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 53 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1820 - 226 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
211
93.36283185840708%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44114 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
26.5625%
Price, €
€145.16
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €145.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
21.79316466932978%
Multi-Core
825
11.244377811094452%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |