Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - €155.88 vs €177.5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74048 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74047 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |