Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7640X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1039 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10320 - 169 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €199.0 vs €199.5
- Up to 3% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10320 - €1.18 vs €1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 65 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |