Buy on Amazon
€53
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 551 days older than the more expensive Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-7700T - 102 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - €53.0 vs €173.76
- Up to 70% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-7700T - €0.52 vs €1.74 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 35 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-6600K 3,5GHz Boxed CPU
Buy for €53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-7700T 2,90GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €173.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 91 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
