Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €63.11 vs €284.09
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-10700F - €0.31 vs €1.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-6600K - 208 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
205
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
22%
Price, €
€284.09
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €284.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |