Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1533 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-7700T - 449 vs 406 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - €148.12 vs €175.79
- Up to 23% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-7700T - €0.33 vs €0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €175.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
449
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |