Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €148.12 vs €188.97
- Up to 21% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13400F - €1.14 vs €1.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-11600 - 131 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12348 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
79%
Price, €
€188.97
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |