Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Celeron G1620 - 169 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €20.16 vs €288.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-4670T - €0.12 vs €1.7 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 943 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |